[Konvas] question

[olivier satnet]

i see "flare" ghost in the lens ....
wich format is ?
look be 16mm ....

look the negative .
if you finish the project in Video , all can be corrected in Telecine ....
( i don t think you need reshoot ..... ) you have enought info in the neg to
have a good final result !

Olivier .



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "t byrne" <vonat8 at verizon.net>
To: "Konvas Discussion List" <cinema at konvas.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Konvas] question


> Underexposed in the camera and then overcompensated in the transfer.
> That does make sense.
>
> Ole Dost wrote:
>
> >Underexposed... I did not expect that. Thank you! I will make one more
try
> >in the way you recommended.
> >The jpeg is a still out of the avi-file I got from the transfer company.
> >They are using a BTS FDL 90 transfer machine that has a quiet good
> >reputation.
> >This company provided me with very good scans, but also with more
> >overexposed seeming scenes like this one than any other company. Only the
> >BW-scenes! All coloured scenes are well exposed. I really never
experienced
> >so badly exposed footage before. I felt very firm in exposing -until I
got
> >these BW results...
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cinema mailing list
> Cinema at konvas.org
> http://konvas.org - All about Konvas, Kinor and other Russian Cinema
Cameras
>
> Be sure to Check out the online Forums:
> http://konvas.org/forum/index.php
>
> Visit the discussion archives:
> http://konvas.org/list-archives.html
>
> Join the Konvas Discussion List:
> http://konvas.org/mailman/listinfo/cinema_konvas.org
>
> Please be kind when replying and crop the replied message!!!