[Konvas] lab accident

[Leo Vale]

Dr.Stone:

Are you referring to my reply To O.D.'s query where my message was somehow  mixed in with Ole's quote instead of being seperated from it?


--- On Thu, 9/11/08, H. W. Stone <colcam at aim.com> wrote:

> From: H. W. Stone <colcam at aim.com>
> Subject: Re: [Konvas] lab accident
> To: cinema at konvas.org
> Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008, 4:13 PM
> Okay, something is going wrong with the list.
> 
> Some emails do not arrive, some arrive out of order, some
> arrive more than once--  is this a konvas.org issue or is
> netscape.net fouling up?
> 
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leo Vale <leoavale at yahoo.com>
> To: Konvas Discussion List <cinema at konvas.org>
> Sent: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 3:54 pm
> Subject: Re: [Konvas] lab accident
> 
 > 
> 
> --- On Thu, 9/11/08, Ole Dost <Ole.Dost at t-online.de>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: Ole Dost <Ole.Dost at t-online.de>
> Subject: [Konvas] lab accident
> To: "'Konvas Discussion List'"
> <cinema at konvas.org>
> Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008, 2:04 PM
> 
  
> 
> What happens to a film that has been exposed at 400 ASA and
> was processed like 200?
> 
> 
> 
> I send an exposed roll of Fuji 400T (expired but always
> stored in a professionals fridge) to very good lab, and they
> treated it as Kodak Vision 2 200T!!! Although I wrote the
> film type on the tin, of course.
> 
> 
> Does it make any sense to have it telecined? Is telecine
> able to “safe” it?
> 
  ---My original message:
 
> All Kodak color cine camera negatives are normally
> processed in ECN-II.   There should be no difference in
> normal processing between the two.   Slightly different
> printing lights,  but identical processing.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> ---LV