[Konvas] Kiev factory and Olympus
Speedbirdmgh at aol.com
Speedbirdmgh at aol.com
Thu Nov 19 11:25:02 CST 2009
Hi Mustafa,
Yes, I saw your recent note that the Kiev factory has closed down. I
thought they closed down in the mid 1990's. What have they been making all this
time? Their last camera's had 93 stamped on them so I assumed they were
1993 models.
I still have a "mint" Kiev 60 and a Kiev 88 which has shutter issues. It's
the corrugated metal curtain shutter which is noisy and does'nt always work
at the right speed. I have a spare 88 body which has the same problems.
Araxphoto claim that their new material shutter will solve the problems but
when you add up all the costs, you may aswell buy a Hasselblad 500.
Upgrading the Kiev 88 is not cost effective as although it exceeds the Kiev 60 in
terms of engineering quality and the use of better all round precision
gearing, it has a much more complicated mechanism probably matching the
Hasselblad's 500 series. However, the Kiev 60 shines through because it's
operation is quite simple compared to the 88 series. It has a cloth curtain which
has been tried and test since the 1930's. It rolls up onto its spool every
time and fires cleanly whereas the Kiev 88's metal curtain does not roll up
as tight and sometimes buckles, you can actually hear it bending under the
strain and it is clearly not happy. The Kiev 60's Arsat lens is a real
"gem' and delivers outstanding images even in bad lighting conditions, not only
is the glass exceptional but the coatings really bring out the colours. I
cannot say the same for the "VOLNA-3 although they could share the same
glass they do not share the same coatings. So its the coating you are paying
for. I would like to get a Pentacon 6 as it's much better made than the
Kiev 60 although the bodies are similar, the Pentacon mechanism is more
precise. I do love the 88 especially the brighter viewfinder but when you press
that shutter button, you know there could be problems. There is too much
going on inside the camera to get that metal curtain moving. You could be
right when you said that a good Leica could be the answer being half the size
and weight but still delivers crisp images. But the cost is outragous.
Changing the subject for a minute with all the ranting and raving with the
Canon D7 has anybody thought of the Olympus Pen with interchangable lenses
and 13 MB imaging. It also boasts of outstanding movie images so could be
adapted to mopic use and is half the size and weight of the Canon. Also is
half the cost of a Canon. Any thoughts?
Rita
More information about the Cinema
mailing list